1994: Crazy Horse Malt Liquor brand reinforces the stereotype of the drunken Indian and is "terribly insensitive.."
1992. May 20 Northwest Herald |
Quotes from the article
- Rep. Ben Nighthorse Campbell (D., Colo.) declared that the sale of Crazy Horse malt liquor is part of an “absolute American tragedy.”
- Rep. Joseph Kennedy (D., Mass.): said that brewers “don’t care what the effect is on the American Indian people . . . as long as they can make money.”
1992, Sept 30. Letters to the Editor: The Real Murderer Of Chief Crazy Horse. The Wall Street Journal. Response to “The Second Murder of Crazy Horse,” (editorial page, Sept. 15) by James Bovard. "Crazy Horse Malt Liquor not only offends many Americans, it also mocks a cultural symbol held dear by Native Americans. Ironically, the symbol is important in the fight against alcoholism among Native Americans.... no one is being lynched, but Crazy Horse is being hijacked and we intend to stop it." Rep. Pat Schroeder (D., Colo.)
1992, November 7 - "It is time we clamp the lids down on profits made at the expense of people's pride and dignity," Surgeon General Antonia Novello said.
1992, Nov 7 Argus Leader |
1992, Nov 7 Stevens Point Journal |
1993, April 14 The Des Moines Register |
1993, Oct 28 St Cloud Times |
1994, March 4 Star Tribune |
PRESS RELEASE
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
HEADLINE: "Crazy Horse" beer connection false and misleading.
DATE: December 2, 1995
CONTACT: Robert Gough, Attorney for
Estate of Tasunke Witko (Crazy Horse)
ROSEBUD, SD -- "The message is clear. Brewing companies using and defaming the good name of our grandfathers will not be tolerated," said Mr. Seth H. Big Crow, Sr., administrator of the Crazy Horse estate upon learning that the label registrations for "The Original Crazy Horse Malt Liquor" and "Chief Oshkosh Beer" had been revoked by the Minnesota Commission for Public Safety as stating connections which are "false and misleading".
In her eight page opinion dated November 28, 1995, Assistant Commissioner Mary Ellison, adopted the findings and recommendation of Administrative Law Judge, Allen Giles, who presided over a two day hearing in April. The Commissioner revoked the label under Minnesota law for liquor brand registration, because "Tasunke Witko (Crazy Horse) was opposed to the use of alcoholic beverages, and because the heirs of his estate have not endorsed and have specifically disavowed any connection with Crazy Horse Malt Liquor, the Crazy Horse Malt Liquor brand label states or implies in a false or misleading manner a connection to Tasunke Witko a/k/a Crazy Horse, a deceased American Indian leader."
Another brand label "Chief Oshkosh Beer", bearing the name of the famous Menominee American Indian leader, was also determined to be false and misleading, and was likewise revoked. Roberta Oshkosh Robinson, of Neopit, Wisconsin, a lineal descendant of the Menominee chief, had provided an affidavit disavowing any association or endorsement to the beer bearing her family name.
"This is a wonderful decision. I would like to see other states begin respecting the rights of Indian people in this way."
The "Crazy Horse Malt Liquor" label has previously been rejected in several states, including Nebraska and Washington, and several other states, including California, are presently considering legislation. Ferolito, Vultaggio & Sons, owners of Hornell Brewing Company, who produce the malt liquor in association with the G. Heileman Brewing Company, also make a line of non-alcoholic products under the "Arizona" iced teas and fruit drinks, have recently found those products the subject of a nationwide boycott called by support groups from New York, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Colorado, and California, as a result of their continued refusal to remove the Crazy Horse name from the malt liquor.
Robert Gough, attorney for the Estate of Tasunke Witko, which intervened in the Minnesota action, welcomed the decision, stating that "Minnesota's revocation of beer labels which falsely depict
American Indian leaders such as the Lakota, Crazy Horse and the Menominee's Chief Oshkosh is a victory for the human rights of all Indian people in this country. It speaks to the protection of the
right of Indians families to control the use of the names of their ancestors and leaders, especially in the area of alcohol products, which are highly regulated and have been particularly devastating
to Indian people."